The pros and cons of a Russian propagandist serving as Director of National Intelligence
WASHINGTON — After the recent confirmation of former congresswoman, cult member, opinion news contributor, and foreign asset Tulsi Gabbard as America’s next Director of National Intelligence, Duffel Blog is weighing the pros and cons of having a bona fide Russian propagandist run a critical national security function.
Pro: This will own the libs, so hard
America has a hard time learning lessons, but one we seem to have clearly internalized is that nothing — regardless of scope or depth of importance and consequence for the bulk of our population and our future — is more important than owning the libs. Do the libs not want this? Then it should definitely happen. This should really be the end of the discussion, but…
Con: Tulsi Gabbard’s public discourse repeatedly supported horrendous dictators who regularly ordered their armed forces to perpetrate atrocities against innocent people
Owning the libs aside, is it weird that the Gabbard — who will be in charge of focusing our intelligence collection and making sense of it for those who decide and execute our foreign policy — appears to be in bed with some of our worst enemies? Sure, whatever.
Pro: Gabbard knows how our enemies think
No one can get inside the heads of our enemies to think like our enemies more than someone who…okay, is probably also just our enemy. Checkmate!
Con: Gabbard might not know how to properly leverage her unprecedented access to our country’s most vital intelligence for personal gain
Prove us wrong, Tuls!
Pro: As a presidential candidate, Gabbard was endorsed by Duffel Blog for the highest office in the land
This endorsement speaks for itself.
Con: As a presidential candidate, Gabbard was endorsed by Duffel Blog for the highest office in the land
This endorsement speaks for itself.
Task Force Football Bat believes egg prices, patriotically renaming large bodies of water, and trans people playing sportsball are the defining issues of our time.